Studio Guide / Lesson 9 · Compare + interpret

Look together + build a comparison

Learning outcomeLook closely at two artworks, add context and build a comparison from evidence.


What students need to know

Key learning points

  • Looking side by side reveals similarities and differences in visual language.
  • Context helps explain how similar forms can carry different meanings.
  • Comparison can connect place, materials and ideas across artist practices.
  • A strong comparison explains why a difference matters using evidence.
ConnectionDifferenceEvidence

Key terms

  • side by side
  • context
  • comparison
  • evidence

01 /Look together

Two works, side by side

Joan Miró

The Hunter (Catalan Landscape)

Montroig, July 1923–winter 1924
Oil on canvas

The Museum of Modern Art, New York

From Week 2 / Place + culture

View artwork ↗

Maree Clarke

Walert – gurn barerarerungar…

2020–21
National Gallery of Victoria

From Week 3 / Belonging + continuity

View artwork ↗

Look at both before you go back to what you know about them.

  • What appears similar?
  • What appears different?
  • Where do you notice simplified forms, repeated marks or signs?
  • What evidence can you point to in each artwork?

Stay with what you can observe at this stage.

Keep in your visual diaryFirst side-by-side observations


02 /Add context

What changes when you know
where the marks come from?

Miró

  • Place
  • Montroig
  • Catalan context
  • Forms transformed into visual language

Clarke

  • Family
  • Country
  • Community
  • Cultural continuity
  • Cultural authority
  • Does something that looks similar necessarily carry the same meaning?
  • What becomes different when you understand the context around each work?

Keep in your visual diaryContext comparison


03 /Build a comparison

A thinking structure

Both

helps identify a meaningful connection.

Both artists use simplified forms.

However

helps identify where the works differ.

However, the forms operate within different systems of meaning.

Because

explains why that difference matters, using evidence and context.

Because each artist works from a different relationship to place, culture and knowledge.

Use this structure to shape the comparison, then write it in your own words, using evidence you can point to in both artworks.

Keep in your visual diaryOne developed comparison


Compare the practices too

Look beyond what the artworks show. Consider how each artist’s practice is shaped by:

  • Place and cultural context
  • Materials and ways of making
  • Presentation
  • Ideas, relationships or knowledge
  • How does each artist’s context shape the way the artwork was made?
  • How does each artist’s practice affect what the artwork communicates?
  • What becomes clearer when you compare the practices as well as the artworks?

Support the comparison with specific evidence.

Two pencil studies of the same seated man drawn side by side on one sketchbook page.
Two studies of the same subject on one page. Placing work side by side is how comparison begins: the differences become visible before they can be explained. The Metropolitan Museum of Art ↗

Critique + feedback

Read your comparison to one other student. They are listening for whether the comparison holds together, not whether they agree with it.

  • Which connection is clear?
  • Which difference is doing the most work?
  • Where does the evidence need to be more specific?

Change one part of your comparison after listening. Note what you changed and why.

Keep in your visual diaryOne change made after feedback


04 /Change the comparison

You have seen how one comparison can be built. Now change one of the artists. Bring forward one artwork from Week 4.

Joan Miró

The Hunter (Catalan Landscape)

Montroig, July 1923–winter 1924
Oil on canvas

The Museum of Modern Art, New York

From Week 2 / Place + culture

MoMA ↗

Maree Clarke

Walert – gurn barerarerungar…

2020–21
National Gallery of Victoria

From Week 3 / Belonging + continuity

NGV ↗

Peter Waples-Crowe

Colonised 3

2017
Digital print on canvas

Squatters and Savages, Art Gallery of Ballarat, 2017

Exhibition catalogue ↗

megan evans

Bleeding Chandelier

2016
Squatters and Savages, Art Gallery of Ballarat, 2017

megan evans / project ↗

Choose a pair

Choose one Week 4 artwork and pair it with either Miró or Clarke. Then choose one thing worth comparing:

  • Role + purpose
  • Cultural position
  • Making + materials
  • Presentation
  • Relationship to history
  • Beliefs + values
  • Collaboration
  • What connects the practices?
  • Where do they differ?
  • Why does that difference matter?
  • What artwork evidence supports your interpretation?
  • What source supports the contextual information you are using?

Keep in your visual diarySecond comparison + source


By the end of this lesson

  • First side-by-side observations
  • A context comparison
  • One developed comparison
  • One change made after feedback
  • A second comparison supported by a source

References

Curriculum + reading

Greenwood, D. (2023). Art creative practice: VCE units 1–4. Cambridge University Press & Assessment.

Artists + artworks

Maree Clarke. Walert – gurn barerarerungar: Tipperary, Ireland Dunstable, Britain Yorta Yorta Trawlwoolway Boonwurrung, Mutti Mutti, Wamba Wamba, 2020–21. NGV ↗

megan evans. Bleeding Chandelier, 2016. megan evans / project ↗

Joan Miró. The Hunter (Catalan Landscape), Montroig, July 1923–winter 1924. MoMA ↗

Peter Waples-Crowe. Colonised 3, 2017. Exhibition catalogue ↗

Museum + gallery sources

Edmonds, F. W. (n.d.). Two studies of a man (from sketchbook). Accession 1987.196.3o recto. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Public domain. The Metropolitan Museum of Art ↗